![]() |
|
|||||||
| Email Comments, Questions and Miscellaneous Share your opinion of the email service you're using. Post general email questions and discussions that don't fit elsewhere. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
|
Web Mail Providers w/ Clean, Simple, Fast Interface?
Hi,
I would appreciate suggestions for email providers that offer a clean, simple, fast-loading web interface for reading and composing messages. (Must be manageable on a dial-up connection (POTS, <56 Kbs)). I have found Gmail (with the basic view option selected) as well as Fastmail quite manageable in this regard but have some other problems with each and would like to know what other options I might have. The major problems I have with Fastmail are the lack of a spam folder for lower-level accounts (no way to retrieve messages wrongly filtered as spam) and having my IP address appear on outgoing mail. I also had one case where the message I sent to someone from my Fastmail account ( ml1.net domain) landed in their spam folder. I wonder whether this was also what happened in a number of other cases where I never received a reply to messages I had sent, but I have no evidence of such and it is entirely possible that other factors were to blame. With Google, I have privacy concerns and differences with some of their policies and philosophy. I have also tried Lavabit but the web interface is quite primitive, has no spam folder (like Fastmail) and can be rather slow and awkward to navigate. I also find myself needing to repeatedly re-log myself in when I shouldn't. So, in summary, are there any options for a web mail service that meet the following criteria: - web-interface that is manageable on a dial-up connection - ability to retrieve messages wrongly filtered as spam- even on free or at least lowest-priced accounts - outgoing messages not stamped with personal IP - clear, transparent privacy policy that is not especially controversial Finally, it would be a plus if JavaScript were not required for at least basic functionality. (I have found this to be the case for all three services I mentioned above: Gmail, Fastmail and Lavabit- none of them require JavaScript for basic functionality.) Thank you for taking the time to read my post and for any information you may be able to provide. Best wishes in the holiday season, 'Snowbound' |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 8,687
|
Quote:
Actually, the only level that doesn't have the good spam protection is the Free Guest account. The Ad-Free account for $4.95 a year and Full and Enhanced accounts all have the "Advanced" Spam Protection that makes a "Junk Mail" folder for spam. You also get a "trainable bayes database" to improve spam filtering. Once you've reported 200 Spam and 200 non-Spam then you get "your personal bayes databases" so it will know what you personally think is spam and non-spam. If you send email from the FM web site then your IP address will not appear in outgoing email. Welcome to EMD ![]() Sherry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,532
Representative of:
tls-mail.com |
(1) squirrelmail, which is simple and lite enough, JS is not required. I have a domain with email hosting on namecheap, so I can choose to use their squirrelmail webmail interface.
(2) sqwebmail, provided by courier-mta.org, is very lite and fast. also this webmail is written with C language, so it's pretty faster than squirrelmail which is written by PHP. sqwebmail reads Maildir directly, not fetching mail via IMAP like squirrelmail etc, so it has great performance advantage than others. Under unbuntu, you just run: Quote:
I even wrote a blog about it (sorry it's with chinese): http://blogs.perl.org/users/pyhs_blo...2/10linux.html My sqwebmail's login url is: http://mail.nsbeta.info:2880/webmail/webmail If you anybody need a test accout to see the demo, could just PM me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 171
|
VFEmail dot Net as my new personal favorite.
Very very reasonable paid plans, and a pretty nice free option too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
Quote:
I personally would only feel comfortable using a service if it was located in a secure data center somewhere. With enterprise level backup power and redundancy in internet connection. The owner is nice and attentive to his customers and charges reasonable prices but he is a one man operation being ran out of his home. Last edited by malcontent : 29 Dec 2010 at 04:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
He's never deleted my free account for inactivity (yet), and even after extreme periods of not logging in there is no spam....and I have a very common short username. It's impressed me enough that after the first of the year I'm going to pay for a subscription. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||||
|
The "e" in e-mail
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,999
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
Quote:
Sorry, I just don't trust my email to a service ran out of someones home. A far less secure location and without redundant internet connection. For a free email account it may be sufficient but for an important primary email account I wouldn't even consider it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
Bottomline is that it's nice clean uncluttered service (The OP was asking for opinions on that) and has outlasted many many others, but it's not right for you...no problem there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK South Coast
Posts: 152
|
try zworg.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Cornerstone of the Community
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 879
|
Zworg is a very good small service that meets most of the OP's criteria, except for the concern about display of IP. It is simple and fast and has a good record for reliability going back to 1998. On the downside, it still displays taglines on the free accounts, and unfortunately it does reveal the IP. Also, like VFEmail, it is a one-man operation (though Tom Fishwick has recently been looking for partners to expand the service), but unlike VFEmail, I doubt the servers are in the owner's house. They are somewhere in Toronto I think, but I don't know whether they are in a secure location or not. I believe there is back-up and redundancy of some sort.
VFEmail comes close to meeting all of the OP's criteria. The IP is displayed in outgoing mail sent from free accounts, but is masked in mail sent from any of the paid accounts. The Horde interface is slow to load on a slow connection and Roundcube is even worse. Still, even for very slow connections, I would recommend either Zworg or VFEmail on the basis of reliability and longevity. Both have been around for a long time and they are not frivolous services. (No affiliation with either one.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Essential Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sound Beach, N.Y.
Posts: 261
|
ZWORG is clean & uncluttered however I could never get mail thru to AOL addresses, mail always bounced with a 554 message claiming ZWORG's IP address was blocked.
Support never responded to my inquiries about it. Anyone else haver this issue? |
|
|
|